Claude is the LLM I use most. 200K context window means it handles entire books. Better at nuance than GPT-4. The Artifacts feature makes coding side-by-side natural. The 15% commission is the lowest on this list, but Anthropic's brand strength means your audience already trusts the recommendation.
What is Claude?
Claude is Anthropic's AI assistant. 200K context window (500-page books fit). Strong at long-form writing, code review, and nuanced reasoning. Sonnet 4.5 (current production model) leads most academic benchmarks. Free at claude.ai, Pro $20/mo, Team $25/user/mo, Enterprise custom.
Why we recommend it
- Best long-form writing quality ? best-in-class for essays, reports, scripts
- 200K context (handles entire books, codebases, transcripts)
- Better at nuance and ethics than GPT-4
- Artifacts (side-by-side coding, document rendering)
- Free tier available ? easy to test, easy to convert
The good & the bad
What works great
- 200K context window: 500-page books fit, codebases in one prompt
- Writing quality: best-in-class for essays, reports, long-form
- Code review: catches subtle bugs other LLMs miss
- Artifacts: side-by-side code rendering, document preview
- Free tier: generous, converts to Pro naturally
Where it struggles
- 15% commission only: lowest rate on this list
- PartnerStack approval: needs vetting, not instant
- Slower than GPT-4: for quick Q&A, GPT is snappier
- No image generation: text-only (use Midjourney alongside)
Final verdict
Should you Claude?
Claude is the LLM I personally use daily for long-form writing and code review. The 15% commission + PartnerStack approval makes it less attractive for affiliates than Notion or Writesonic, but the brand recognition is unmatched ? audiences don't need to be sold on Anthropic.